[ad_1]
I spent just a few years litigating IP within the Twin Cities, and I’ve at all times thought that the US would enormously profit from the creation of a parallel Article I-established Court docket system for tech, patents, and marks (district, circuit, and supreme — with solely SCOTUS having subject material jurisdiction over ultimate rulings)
The constitutional potential is there to do it, and it could take away the troublesome onus of requiring an article 3 generalist federal judiciary to morph into science and tech specialists.
A lot of the legislation is figuring out whether or not “it is a that,“ however 75-80% of the time there’s a basic disconnect in even totally understanding the contours of what’s being litigated, a lot much less how all of the shifting components match into a bigger framework.
Now we have been faking it till we make it for about 40 years, and the system is very damaged… and that doesn’t even start to handle the generational divide normally technical understanding of a quickly evolving technological world.
[ad_2]
Source link
