Activist Politan Capital engages with Azenta. Here’s how the firm may boost shareholder value

Enterprise: Azenta is a life sciences firm that operates by means of two segments. First, there’s the life sciences merchandise division, which presents automated chilly pattern administration programs for compound and organic pattern storage, gear for pattern preparation and dealing with, consumables and devices that assist clients in managing samples all through their analysis discovery and improvement workflows. Then, there’s the life sciences companies section, which gives complete pattern administration packages, built-in chilly chain options, informatics and sample-based laboratory companies to advance scientific analysis and assist drug improvement. The companies embody pattern storage, genomic sequencing, gene synthesis, laboratory processing, laboratory evaluation, biospecimen procurement and different assist companies.

Inventory Market Worth: $3.02B ($50.19 per share)

Share Possession: 6.87%

Common Value: $44.83

Activist Commentary: Politan Capital Administration was based by Quentin Koffey. Most just lately, Koffey led the activism technique at Senator Funding Group. Previous to that, he led the activist observe at D.E. Shaw, and earlier than that he was at Elliott Associates. Koffey is working Politan extra like a non-public fairness fund than a standard long-short fairness hedge fund, as it could actually draw down locked-up capital to offer it sufficient time to perform its objectives by means of energetic engagement with boards and administration groups to enhance governance, operations or strategic path. Politan seems for prime quality companies that underperform their friends or potential. These companies even have a transparent repair and an outlined pathway to implement that resolution. That is Politan’s second 13D submitting and third activist marketing campaign, all of which have been within the health-care sector.

Politan has engaged in discussions with the Azenta board and administration workforce concerning the corporate’s enterprise, operations, monetary situation, strategic plans, governance and different issues.

Azenta (previously often known as Brooks Automation) shouldn’t be a brand new firm. It has been round for almost half a century. For many years it operated as a number one automation supplier and accomplice to the worldwide semiconductor manufacturing trade. On Feb. 1, 2022, Azenta bought its semiconductor automation enterprise to Thomas H. Lee Companions, L.P. for about $3 billion. At this time, it focuses completely on the life sciences companies. Now, the corporate produces and companies chilly storage options and is the biggest supplier in its markets. 

Following the sale of the semiconductor enterprise, the corporate had $2.7 billion of internet money on its steadiness sheet. Azenta used roughly $1 billion of that for inventory buybacks and roughly $500 million to amass B Medical, a temperature-controlled storage and transportation options enterprise. That leaves them right now with $1.1 billion in internet money and a $3.0 billion market cap. One-third of the corporate is money, and buyers wish to know the way it plans to deploy that capital. They usually do have some trigger to be involved. Whereas the share buyback was properly suggested, the acquisition of B Medical – which was accomplished on Oct. 3, 2022 – was not properly acquired by the market. When the transaction was first introduced on Aug. 8, 2022, the inventory dropped over 10% by means of the next two days. Moreover, Azenta has missed steerage repeatedly, estimating double-digit margins and robust income development, and falling woefully quick on each metrics. This has put extra stress on the inventory, which has dropped from $69.01 per share previous to the B Medical acquisition announcement to $50.77 previous to Politan’s 13D submitting, a complete of 26.4%. Over the identical time, the S&P 500 has returned 8.1%.

Azenta has a really robust core enterprise. The issues it’s experiencing all revolve across the extra money on the steadiness sheet. First, with one-third of the market cap of the corporate sitting in money, it’s inconceivable to precisely worth Azenta when there is no such thing as a clear path for a way that capital will probably be put to work. That is exacerbated through the use of $500 million on an acquisition that the market didn’t seem to agree with. This makes the corporate un-investable for a lot of buyers, not as a result of they don’t imagine in administration or suppose administration is doing a foul job, however due to the uncertainty over such an enormous a part of its asset base. Nevertheless, this similar dynamic creates a chance for activist buyers. By getting a shareholder consultant on the board who has a historical past of not solely safeguarding, however rising shareholder worth, it should give the market confidence that the capital will probably be put to an accretive use. This alone can change an organization from buying and selling at a reduction to buying and selling at a premium.

The second challenge with the corporate is income development and working margins. The expansion hurdles will not be as a lot of an absolute challenge as a relative one. Azenta’s high line has been rising, simply not as quick as the corporate’s steerage. This additionally could be alleviated by including board members with expertise in speaking to the investor world. Additional, working margins have been considerably compressed, notably versus steerage, however that is typically an issue with corporations which have an extra amount of money. Corporations that get a sudden inflow of money typically lose the self-discipline to rein in prices as there is no such thing as a urgency to function on a decent funds. Placing a great portion of the money to make use of properly wouldn’t solely create shareholder worth, however it will power administration to be extra disciplined of their spending. This is able to result in higher working margins which are extra in step with administration steerage.

If Politan is investing $200 million into an organization that has one-third of its market cap in internet money, we anticipate the agency will desire a seat on the desk to advise on how that money needs to be spent. We additionally imagine that different shareholders would need the identical. That is one thing administration ought to need, too. Let’s make one factor clear that’s typically misunderstood in activist conditions: Simply because Politan filed a 13D and simply because the agency is assembly with administration, doesn’t imply that it’s essential of administration. It additionally doesn’t essentially imply that the agency shouldn’t be on the identical web page as administration. It is vitally attainable that each Politan and administration wish to do what’s greatest for the share value and each worth the opposite’s opinion, and we see a fast appointment to the Azenta board. Nevertheless, if that’s not the course taken, Politan has proven that it has conviction in its investments and won’t shrink back from a proxy battle. Given the corporate’s current efficiency and the information of this case, we don’t suppose it should come to that. Azenta’s director nomination deadline is Nov. 2, so we won’t have to attend that lengthy for a solution.  

Ken Squire is the founder and president of 13D Monitor, an institutional analysis service on shareholder activism, and the founder and portfolio supervisor of the 13D Activist Fund, a mutual fund that invests in a portfolio of activist 13D investments. Azenta is owned within the fund.