The Constancy MSCI Client Staples Index ETF (NYSEMKT:FSTA) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Client Staples ETF (NYSEMKT:RSPS) differ most in value and portfolio focus: RSPS follows an equal-weight technique, whereas FSTA prices a a lot decrease charge whereas emphasizing sector giants.
Each ETFs goal the U.S. client staples sector, however their approaches and value factors differ meaningfully. This comparability explores their value constructions, threat profiles, latest efficiency, and portfolio development to assist traders weigh which ETF could enchantment for defensive publicity.
|
Metric |
RSPS |
FSTA |
|---|---|---|
|
Issuer |
Invesco |
Constancy |
|
Expense ratio |
0.40% |
0.08% |
|
1-yr return (as of 2026-02-13) |
14.9% |
10.7% |
|
Dividend yield |
2.5% |
2.0% |
|
Beta |
0.61 |
0.64 |
|
AUM |
$264 million |
$1.4 billion |
Beta measures value volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year month-to-month returns. The 1-yr return represents complete return over the trailing 12 months.
FSTA is notably extra reasonably priced, charging simply 0.08% yearly in comparison with RSPS’s 0.40%, and its dividend yield is modestly decrease at 2.0% versus 2.5% for RSPS.
|
Metric |
RSPS |
FSTA |
|---|---|---|
|
Max drawdown (5 y) |
(18.6%) |
(16.6%) |
|
Development of $1,000 over 5 years |
$1,245 |
$1,584 |
FSTA tracks the efficiency of the MSCI USA IMI Client Staples Index and holds 97 shares, with 99% of its belongings allotted to client staples names. The fund is over 12 years outdated and closely weighted towards massive sector leaders, with Walmart (NASDAQ:WMT), Costco Wholesale (NASDAQ:COST), and Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG) collectively making up over one-third of belongings.
RSPS, in distinction, equally weights 38 shares from the S&P 500, leading to much less focus threat. Prime holdings embrace Bunge International SA (NYSE:BG), Colgate-Palmolive (NYSE:CL), and Church & Dwight. (NYSE:CHD) Every is round 3% of the portfolio. RSPS’s strategy spreads sector publicity extra evenly and avoids outsize bets on mega-cap staples. Neither fund employs leverage, hedging, or ESG screens.
For extra steerage on ETF investing, try the whole information at this hyperlink.
Each funds supply publicity to client staples which are traditionally seen as defensive towards market volatility or financial softness. These ETFs present publicity to the necessities that customers purchase on daily basis, comparable to meals and cleansing provides.
FSTA is clearly going to avoid wasting traders cash on charges over the long run. Its 0.08% expense ratio is near all-time low, whereas RSPS’s greater 0.40% expense ratio is comparatively excessive. This isn’t a lot in a single 12 months, however it could actually add up over a decade or extra.
