Rishi Sunak has conceded that the multi-billion-pound enterprise assist schemes he designed as chancellor throughout the pandemic propped up firms that “would and may” have gone beneath, in a placing admission that has reignited the controversy over how far the state ought to go to maintain struggling corporations alive.
Writing in The Instances to coincide with America’s 250th anniversary celebrations, the previous prime minister argued that Britain should be taught to embrace the “inventive destruction” that has powered the US financial system forward of its rivals, even when meaning watching extra companies fail.
“It’s by no means simple to sit down within the Treasury and watch a enterprise go beneath, however intervening is sort of all the time the flawed factor to do,” Sunak wrote, including that the push to assemble Covid assist schemes left no time to tell apart between basically weak corporations and viable companies knocked sideways by lockdowns. “As chancellor, this was one of many issues I anxious about most: had these interventions upended the pure processes of the financial system? I worry they did.”
The intervention will resonate uncomfortably with the tons of of 1000’s of small enterprise house owners who credit score furlough, bounce again loans and enterprise charges reduction with their survival, however Sunak’s analysis of the UK’s underlying malaise is tougher to dismiss.
On the coronary heart of his argument is the declare that Britain’s financial system has misplaced its dynamism. Almost one in ten listed UK corporations is now a so-called zombie firm, producing simply sufficient money to service its money owed and little else, a determine that has doubled for the reason that monetary disaster. As Enterprise Issues reported earlier this 12 months, a contemporary wave of zombie corporations is already going through collapse as HMRC begins to name in pandemic-era tax arrears.
Sunak factors to OECD analysis on declining enterprise dynamism exhibiting that agency entry and exit charges have fallen by round three proportion factors throughout the developed world since 2000. Earlier than the monetary disaster, the churn of corporations coming into and leaving the market added an estimated 0.7 per cent to UK productiveness progress. That contribution has since collapsed to only 0.1 per cent.
The distinction with the US is stark. The median age of America’s 20 largest listed firms has fallen from 124 years in 2010 to 50 in 2025, as new know-how corporations displaced older incumbents. Within the UK, the equal determine has risen from 94 to 121 over the identical interval.
The end result, Sunak argues, is an financial system during which neither labour nor capital flows to the place it’s best. UK GDP per head now sits 42 per cent under America’s, and Workplace for Nationwide Statistics comparisons present British output per hour labored has trailed the US, France and Germany for 4 a long time, although as Enterprise Issues has beforehand explored, not everybody accepts the standard studying of Britain’s productiveness numbers.
Sunak attributes American outperformance to 4 elements: low-cost and plentiful vitality, with British corporations paying 4 instances as a lot for energy as their US counterparts; quicker know-how adoption; the greenback’s reserve forex standing; and, above all, a tradition that treats enterprise failure as a traditional a part of entrepreneurship slightly than a political emergency.
The previous Conservative chief reserved explicit criticism for the Employment Rights Act, which he described as “sclerosis-inducing” laws that has undermined Britain’s versatile labour market, and which he stated any future authorities severe about progress must repeal. The laws, which cleared its ultimate parliamentary hurdle final 12 months, has drawn repeated warnings from small corporations over hiring prices and tribunal threat.
His conclusion is unlikely to win many votes, however it’s refreshingly candid for a former occupant of Quantity 11: “We will’t, and shouldn’t want to, save each enterprise. We should be taught to like inventive destruction or see our financial energy destroyed.”
For SME house owners, the message cuts each methods. A extra dynamic financial system guarantees cheaper capital, higher employees and greater alternatives for the productive majority. But it surely additionally signifies that the following time a disaster hits, the protection internet could also be significantly smaller.

