[ad_1]
In 2014, a Colorado singer-songwriter accepted a seemingly innocuous pal request on Fb. This morning, almost a decade later, the Supreme Courtroom will hear a case in regards to the fallout — and it’d redefine what’s authorized to say on-line.
Attorneys will current arguments in the present day in Counterman v. Colorado, a intently watched case in regards to the boundaries of illegal “true threats.” The case’s petitioner, Billy Raymond Counterman, claims that he was convicted of stalking primarily based on an excessively broad definition of a menace. He argues {that a} sequence of Fb messages weren’t meant to trigger misery and shouldn’t be legally actionable. On the opposite facet, the state of Colorado argues it ought to be ample for an affordable particular person to search out these…
Proceed studying…
[ad_2]
Source link
