Why Everyone Wants to Buy Twitter

Elon Musk is the most recent wealthy man to have fallen for the lure of Twitter.

For almost its whole 16-year life, Twitter has had the status that it hasn’t fulfilled its potential and could possibly be a lot extra. Twitter’s conundrum is that it’s extensively recognized however not that extensively used, financially profitable however not wildly so, generally competently managed but in addition chaotic, and influential in a approach that’s thrilling but in addition terrifying.

The perpetual perception that Twitter is one huge concept away from being superb has made many individuals take into consideration shopping for the corporate to make it shine, however hardly anybody needs to really personal it.

Whether or not you’re hooked on Twitter or among the many world’s majority that stays off the app, what occurs to this firm issues. Twitter is a digital gathering place that world leaders more and more concern and wish to management, and the place elected officers, activists, journalists and executives like Musk unfold their messages and settle scores.

Musk made a half-baked proposal final week to purchase Twitter that successfully put a for-sale signal on the corporate. What occurs subsequent is anybody’s guess.

Perhaps Musk will wind up proudly owning Twitter, if he stays lengthy sufficient to seek out moneybags to assist him afford his provide of about $43 billion. Maybe a special billionaire, tech firm or monetary investor will purchase it as a substitute. Perhaps nobody buys Twitter.

Residing with an unsure future is nothing new for Twitter. You would spend days tallying the variety of occasions that corporations have thought of shopping for the social media web site, or that there have been rumors a couple of attainable sale.

Twitter has been perpetually on the market partly for technical causes. Not like some tech and media corporations together with Google, Fb and The New York Occasions, Twitter doesn’t have a particular kind of inventory that empowers its founders to all however veto a sale.

However there’s additionally the perennial perception that Twitter needs to be one thing aside from what it’s. There’s no scarcity of people that imagine that each one Twitter wants is a few repair — an edit perform, totally different administration, a brand new kind of expertise spine, a shift of promoting technique, decrease bills and app tweaks, or extra lax guidelines of expression, as Musk needs.

Politicians and different influential individuals, together with Musk, often complain that Twitter is censoring an excessive amount of or too little. And buyers in Twitter perpetually say that the corporate doesn’t make sufficient cash.

If I might boil that right down to a sentence, it’s that Twitter shouldn’t be Fb, which has 23 occasions the annual income of Twitter and almost two billion every day customers to Twitter’s 217 million. (The businesses rely customers barely otherwise, however you get the purpose.)

“The cultural affect of Twitter is simply as nice as Fb and but it’s one-twentieth of the scale,” mentioned Mark Mahaney, who has adopted Twitter for years as an funding analyst now with Evercore ISI. That makes individuals ask, “‘What’s fallacious with Twitter?’” he mentioned.

And but the individuals and firms who’ve regarded intently at shopping for Twitter have largely been scared off. In 2016, Disney backed off its flirtation with shopping for it partly as a result of executives nervous about trashing the corporate’s household pleasant picture if it owned an unruly social media app. The Salesforce boss, Marc Benioff, modified his thoughts when Salesforce’s buyers hated the concept of a enterprise software program firm proudly owning Twitter.

The federal government authorities probably wouldn’t allow corporations that will appear to be a superb match with Twitter, together with Google and Fb, to purchase it due to antitrust issues.

Twitter is just too huge, but in addition not sufficiently big. It’s good, but in addition not adequate. It’s not Fb, which makes individuals wish to purchase it but in addition not wish to. Twitter might give any proprietor affect but in addition undesirable warmth.

Musk could be one of many few individuals on this planet who’s courageous (or silly) sufficient to wish to personal Twitter and really do it. Perhaps Musk is the one who can lastly unleash Twitter’s potential. Or perhaps he’ll simply wind up on the lengthy listing of people that as soon as believed that they might.

Earlier than we go …

• Advertisements are in all probability coming to Netflix: The corporate disclosed that it misplaced subscribers and expects to lose extra. In response, Netflix mentioned that it deliberate to crack down on individuals who share accounts and — it is a huge one — sooner or later promote a lower-cost subscription with commercials, my colleague Nicole Sperling defined.

  Extra from Vox: Netflix was the streaming chief for a decade. “Now everyone seems to be catching up.”

• Utilizing memes to assist Ukraine: My colleague Jane Arraf wrote about charitable fund-raising efforts for Ukrainians that promote merchandise that includes wartime visible in-jokes that usually unfold on-line, together with one of many Virgin Mary holding an antitank missile.

• They’re the tech help and managers for grownup video streaming: Remainder of World goes behind the scenes of Colombia’s trade for erotic web streaming, together with individuals who repair on-line glitches for performers, remind them of lunch breaks and assist design every day subjects for webcam reveals. (A heads up that this text has some sexually express descriptions.)

Hugs to this

Take a look at this teeny newborn orangutan on the Oregon Zoo.

We wish to hear from you. Inform us what you consider this text and what else you’d like us to discover. You possibly can attain us at ontech@nytimes.com.

When you don’t already get this text in your inbox, please enroll right here. You too can learn previous On Tech columns.