Tech corporations all the time like to make large claims. Just like the one Google made concerning the Pixel Watch 5: promised well being, wellness and Put on OS enhancements apart, there was one function that my ears pricked up for. Google acknowledged that the Pixel Watch 5 included its most correct GPS route monitoring for train. Extra apparently, Google mentioned that monitoring outperformed the Apple Watch Extremely 3 and the Garmin Fenix 8 Professional.
I’ve used each of these smartwatches and I can confidently say they’re two of the perfect performing smartwatches out there for GPS route monitoring. I’ve listened to different smartwatch manufacturers discuss large about Apple and Garmin-beating efficiency. Did I actually consider Google was going to ship? I used to be sceptical, given my expertise of the GPS monitoring on earlier Pixel Watches.
However I nonetheless had my Fenix 8 Professional and Watch Extremely 3, which made for the proper alternative to see these promised efficiency features for myself. Having only in the near past made it by means of the thousands and thousands within the poll to safe a spot within the double-day 2027 London Marathon, my thoughts instantly went to the a part of the marathon route I do know causes main points with GPS.
Newest Movies FromTechRadar
I grabbed my watches, jumped on a practice, after which onto the DLR tram service to the Isle of Canines, the place the close by tall skyscrapers all the time create troublesome GPS circumstances. I ran miles 18-20 of the London Marathon course, after which did it in reverse, to place the Pixel Watch 5’s large GPS claims to the take a look at.
How precisely does the Google Pixel Watch 5’s new GPS work?
Earlier than entering into how the testing went, it’s value drilling down into simply how Google says its GPS monitoring outperforms the competitors. Just like the Fenix 8 Professional and Watch Extremely 3, the Pixel Watch 5 consists of dual-band GPS. This implies it may talk to main satellites chargeable for calculating our exact places over two frequency bands. This can assist to spice up monitoring accuracy when transferring by means of tall buildings, densely forested environments and even throughout adversarial climate circumstances.
Twin band GPS setups have began to look throughout a variety of smartwatches and in my very own testing, twin band-packing watches from Apple, Garmin and Suunto have delivered the strongest efficiency.
Together with the newest in GPS know-how in tow, Google says it makes use of information it has already captured of buildings in Google Maps alongside AI to raised account for the areas the place GPS indicators bounce off buildings. It additionally used GPS reference stations it has positioned world wide to assist take care of the influence that atmospheric circumstances can have on GPS monitoring.
In case you’ve used a smartwatch with GPS, then you definately’ll comprehend it’s a function that does have a notable influence on battery drain. That is one thing Google had to consider right here. Google has made the choice to compress the uncooked GPS information captured on the watch after which ship it to a server the place it’s processed and corrected, then synced to the Google Well being app. So the processing primarily happen off the watch or after your run, experience or hike.
How I examined
(Picture credit score: Future / Mike Sawh)
I made a decision I’d do two runs. The primary can be ranging from mile 18 as much as mile 20 on the London Marathon course and go a bit of additional to run 5k. I’d then cease the watches and do the route in reverse.
I had a trimmed down model of the marathon route uploaded to my Garmin Fenix 8 Professional because it was the best watch to do it on. I additionally determined that I might put on the Pixel Watch 5 on one wrist after which swap over to the opposite for the second run, whereas having the Apple Watch Extremely 3 and Fenix 8 Professional sat on the other wrist. I needed to make it possible for the 2 smartwatches weren’t sitting too shut collectively to forestall any unintended button presses that may influence on capturing the proper distance.
It’s additionally value including that I made a decision to make use of native exercise monitoring apps on all three watches to document runs.
The outcomes
On the primary run, I had the Pixel Watch 5 on my proper wrist with the Apple Watch Extremely 3 and the Garmin Fenix 8 Professional on the left wrist. I uploaded the routes to the very useful comparability instrument IloveGPX. Earlier than that although, I needed to convert the route file captured by the Pixel Watch 5 from a TCX file to a GPX one. Fortunately it was fairly simple.
Even earlier than I started zooming into the GPS tracks I might already see some pink squiggles, which belonged to the Garmin Fenix 8 Professional. On nearer inspection, all three watches have been fairly shut to one another earlier than the Fenix 8 Professional monitor began to noticeably drift off. Google and Apple’s tracks for almost all of the run stay shut collectively.
I really went a bit of off-route and ran longer than deliberate as some elements of the route have been partly closed off. That meant an additional loop or two of that problematic GPS sign spot.
Shifting onto Trafalgar Method, having handed Billingsgate Market and in direction of that last mile, and the three tracks come again collectively. There’s nonetheless time for Garmin’s monitor to veer barely astray although, as I made my method to the tip of the route in Poplar.
Trying on the distance tracked, I ended up working longer than the deliberate 5k route, and the Apple Watch Extremely 3 and Google Pixel Watch 5 recorded comparable distance information — with the Fenix 8 Professional measuring longer with a distinction of 0.2 miles/0.3km.
The common pace of the run was once more comparable on the Watch Extremely 3 and Pixel Watch 5, with the Garmin reporting a slower common pace.
On the second run, I switched the Pixel Watch 5 over to my left wrist and moved the Fenix and Apple Watch over to the suitable. I ran this run a bit of faster than the primary. At the start of the run, all three tracks remained collectively. Then as I began to strategy these towering buildings round Canary Wharf as soon as once more, the Apple and Garmin tracks began to lose their approach. In the meantime, the Pixel Watch 5’s tracks handle to stay closest to the precise route I’d run. It’s not proof against points, nonetheless, particularly once I hit round Heron Quays and Financial institution Road Canary Wharf.
Trying over the space tracked once more and the three smartwatches put up three completely different information. The Garmin once more tracks longer, with the Apple Watch Extremely 3 being closest to the deliberate 5k route. It’s the Garmin that has me working a quicker-than-average tempo all through the run.
GPS tracks are just one a part of the story
For anybody that’s run the London Marathon (or any race for that matter), it’s not nearly distance lined. Pacing issues. Particularly if you happen to’re been coaching to chase down a specific end time.
Dangerous GPS route monitoring information can influence on tempo information. Having run the London Marathon earlier than, these GPS issues will trigger your finding monitoring to skip, suggesting you’re clocking off these miles faster than you’re really travelling.
That’s additionally why I paid consideration to my present and common tempo information on the three watches, in addition to taking a look at how that pacing was damaged down post-run.
Throughout the run, the pacing fluctuated throughout all three watches. I discovered the Pixel Watch 5 had an inclination to battle getting pacing information proper in the beginning of the 2 runs earlier than settling down after. It was an analogous story for Apple and Garmin as properly. All of them appeared to battle within the part of the route I’d anticipated them to.
Trying on the post-run information within the respective companion apps, the Pixel Watch 5 did point out some faster paces that I’d felt I’d run as properly.
Are Google’s claims concerning the Pixel Watch 5’s GPS justified ?
I’m not going to say the Pixel Watch 5 is definitively a GPS nice after two comparatively quick runs in albeit very difficult GPS circumstances. What I’ll say is that I used to be fairly shocked by the outcomes. I had totally anticipated the Pixel Watch 5 to flounder, however it was really essentially the most dependable in plotting my precise working route. The Apple Watch Extremely 3 additionally did properly, whereas the Fenix 8 Professional had some wild moments within the produced GPS tracks.
I feel if you happen to’re primarily focused on having a document of your exact route, then this innovation goes to impress. I’d say hikers will definitely like the thought of it.
From a working perspective, particularly from a racing viewpoint, I’d additionally need correct pacing to go together with that sturdy route monitoring in real-time too. I’m not wholly satisfied the pacing information is as spotless because the route monitoring appears to be. Perhaps that’s one thing Google will take a look at for the subsequent watch and even tighten up with a software program replace.
The Pixel Watch 5’s new GPS indicators an essential breakthrough for the way smartwatches can ship extra correct route monitoring. Google’s entry to an abundance of positioning information, together with the enhancements it’s making with AI clearly play their half in making this kind of leap in smartwatch GPS know-how.
It’s positively given me meals for thought as I select which smartwatch I step on that London begin line with subsequent April, that’s for certain.
Comply with TechRadar on Google Information and add us as a most well-liked supply to get our skilled information, opinions, and opinion in your feeds.
