Andy Burnham has been in Downing Road for barely a day, and rural Britain has already offered him along with his first bill. Farmers, landowners and the broader countryside financial system are demanding that the brand new Prime Minister and his shock Chancellor, John Healey, reverse the inheritance tax adjustments which have convulsed British agriculture since 2024.
The stress lands squarely on the brand new occupant of No 11, a former Treasury minister who now inherits essentially the most contentious tax coverage of the Labour period alongside the nation’s chequebook.
The row dates again to Rachel Reeves’s first Price range, when she introduced that agricultural property aid (APR) and enterprise property aid (BPR), the mechanisms that enable farms and household corporations to cross between generations and not using a tax invoice forcing a sale, can be restricted from April 2026.
After months of tractor protests in Westminster, the federal government blinked simply earlier than Christmas. The brink for 100 per cent aid was raised from £1 million to £2.5 million per property, with married {couples} in a position to mix allowances to £5 million, and 50 per cent aid above that. In response to the Home of Commons Library, the Treasury expects the concession to halve the variety of affected estates, from 375 to 185 in 2026-27.
For a lot of within the sector that was mitigation, not decision. The Nation Land and Enterprise Affiliation has argued the reforms may have an effect on round 70,000 farms, and a bunch of farmers took the federal government to the Excessive Court docket in March in a judicial evaluation over the dearth of formal session on the adjustments.
What offers the marketing campaign recent enamel is Burnham’s personal phrases. Throughout his by-election marketing campaign in Makerfield, he mentioned: “I personally have heard from farmers on household farms and I do suppose that wants once more.”
Farming teams intend to carry him to it. CLA director north Harriet Ranson mentioned: “So far, he has made a number of commitments to the farming and meals sector corresponding to pledging to revisit the growth-inhibiting inheritance tax on farms, in addition to directing the general public sector to acquire meals extra regionally.”
She added: “It’s my honest hope that our ‘prime minister in ready’ will recognize the entrepreneurial attitudes and enterprise brains that make up the agricultural financial system and work with us to strengthen meals manufacturing, nature restoration and the valued abilities of the communities we characterize.”
The prize, from the Treasury’s perspective, is modest income. The danger is a repeat of the scenes that outlined the previous 18 months: tractors on Whitehall, farm-gate protests and a rural financial system that feels singled out. NFU president Tom Bradshaw described December’s concession as one which “will come as an enormous aid to many”, whereas CLA president Gavin Lane mentioned it spared household farms from “seeing their companies taxed out of existence”. Neither organisation regards the matter as closed.
For Burnham, the politics are finely balanced. He has already signalled there may be “room for motion” on tax, pledging enterprise charges cuts for pubs and excessive road corporations. Extending that flexibility to the countryside would delight a sector that spans all the pieces from dairy farms to diversified customer points of interest, the breadth of enterprise celebrated on the Rural Enterprise Awards, that are going down on the Nationwide Convention Centre this November.
For rural enterprise house owners, the sensible recommendation is unchanged: succession planning can not wait on Westminster. However with a Prime Minister on document promising to look once more, and a Chancellor along with his first Price range to write down this autumn, the countryside has not often had a clearer window wherein to press its case.

